Beach-user perceptions and attitudes towards drone surveillance as a shark-bite mitigation tool

Beach-user perceptions and attitudes towards drone surveillance as a shark-bite mitigation tool

Debra Stokes, Kirin Apps, Paul A. Butcher, Betty Weiler, Hanabeth Luke, Andrew P. Colefax

ABSTRACT:

Management of human-wildlife conflict is often challenging and complex, particularly when the conflict involves sharks. New technologies are being trialled in New South Wales, on Australia’s east coast, to accommodate the community demand for increased beach-user protection that does not harm marine wildlife. Drones (or unmanned aerial vehicles), are one of a suite of potential tools that can address both these demands. We released an online survey to assess beach-user perceptions and attitudes toward drones on NSW beaches as a shark surveillance tool. From 439 respondents, we found the use of drones on coastal beaches was accepted by the majority of people surveyed (88%) due to perceptions of reduced impact on sharks, and the relatively low cost. Drone surveillance was also the preferred approach for bather protection overall. Arguably the most vulnerable beach-user group for a shark bite incident, surfers, claimed the highest level of awareness of the use of drones for shark surveillance, but also indicated lower confidence in their utility compared to other groups. The study demonstrates an overall social licence regarding the use of drones for shark surveillance purposes, with the levels of support likely to increase with further public education efforts and improvements to the efficacy of drone-based surveillance.

Marine Policy, Volume 120, October 2020, 104127, DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104127

SOURCE