Ill-Advised Tourism ‘Adventure’ Threatens Kenyan Whale Sharks

News Release

Born Free Foundation

27. March 2013

Born Free Foundation and international marine experts are outraged

KENYA, 27th March, 2013.  Widespread opposition between the company Seaquarium Ltd in Kenya and wildlife conservation groups and marine scientists is mounting related to a proposal to begin catching wild migrating whale sharks for public display in a marine enclosure off the southern Kenyan coast ostensibly for the purposes of “tourism and conservation.”  

Whale sharks are the largest fish on the planet and, while their huge size and gaping-mouthed appearance can be terrifying, these docile plankton feeders pose no threat to man and are fully protected under various international wildlife laws and conventions.

A plan proposed by Seaquarium Ltd to capture wild whale sharks and transfer them to a shallow 600m diameter enclosure, and charge tourists to swim with these sea leviathans, has marine biologists and other wildlife conservation groups up in arms.

The situation has come to a climax as the closing date for public comment on the project’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) comes to an end this week. The EIA is rich in references to the anticipated, and much exaggerated financial benefits of the project, an undisclosed proportion of which they claim will be shared with local communities to encourage them to protect whale sharks.

However, internationally recognised marine scientists, including Dr David Obura who has extensively studied the marine ecosystems of Kenya, feel that critical questions remain concerning the risks associated with capturing wild whale sharks; the welfare of these highly migratory animals when in captivity; and the dubious conservation and research claims of the project’s proponents.

According to Dr. Obura, “The conservation arguments for this project do not add up. There is no evidence to suggest whale sharks are being actively hunted, or that numbers are declining as a result.  I am concerned that the welfare of these incredible creatures is the last thing on the mind of Seaquarium. You cannot tell me that such a sensitive species which is known to migrate more than 3,000km in a year, and dive down to 1,000 meters, can be happily confined to a shallow netted pond in the sea, with no possible escape from tourist stress, no ability to feed naturally, nor seek out the natural conditions that suit it at different times of the year, nor socialize.”

“We know very little about whale shark reproduction, and the claims that the project will also be used for captive breeding are therefore highly spurious as well. No captive whale sharks have ever mated, in over 20 years of trials in other countries. This project is flawed from top to bottom,” Dr. Obura explained. 

With wild and increasingly ethically-regulated encounters with free-living whale sharks available at a number of sites on the East African coast, the tourism argument for this does not stack up. Nonetheless, apparently without the endorsement of Kenya’s Wildlife Service, Seaquarium has already constructed the enclosure and plans to start trapping wild whale sharks to stock it.

Aaron Nicholas, Conservation Manager, Born Free Foundation, stated: “We hope that this project will go no further and that Kenya will retain its pre-eminent position in Africa as a country that does not exploit its wildlife, with a focus on the truly wild experience that draws millions of tourists each year to its parks and waters to the benefit of millions of people nation-wide. Furthermore, if the people behind this flawed and deeply misguided project really cared about the future of whale sharks they could support field-based conservation measures, including working with fishing communities and enhancing the capacity of Kenya’s marine protection agency to make a real difference for this species in the wild – where it belongs.

Source: Born Free Foundation

Note by Shark Year Magazine:

Please see also

31. March 2013 EAWST responds to Born Free Foundation allegations

———-

 

2 Comments

  1. This is one of the most ignorant projects I have ever seen. I don’t know why I am surprised by a proposal that fosters humans loving  something to death. We continue to do it to cetaceans. Why not sharks?  “Hey kids… Come and admire the beautiful, traumatized and near-death animal!”  Utter nonsense. 

  2. This is one of the most ignorant projects I have ever seen. I don’t know why I am surprised by a proposal that fosters a humans ability to love something to death. We continue to do it to cetaceans. Why not sharks?  “Hey kids… Come and admire the beautiful, traumatized and near-death animal!”  Utter nonsense.

Reply to Allen Andrews comment